Cryptocurrency 401k Contribution Question Becomes Politicized – The National Law Review
https://ift.tt/7ArC6ZG
A recent release by the DOL raising concerns about plan sponsors allowing cryptocurrency investments in 401(k) plans has gotten the attention of both sides of the Congressional aisle as well as industry groups. Some of the reactions to the release have sought to convince the DOL to take a step back, but the DOL has indicated on several occasions that it has no intention of doing so.
On March 10, 2022, the DOL issued Compliance Assistance Release No. 2022-21 (the “Release”), which laid out the DOL’s skepticism on the prudence of cryptocurrency investments in 401(k) plans, including through brokerage windows that permit participants to place 401(k) assets in investments other than those included in the plan’s core menu affirmatively selected by plan fiduciaries.
The Release sets forth the following five concerns the DOL has regarding risks associated with such investments in 401(k) plans:
Cryptocurrency is highly speculative and subject to extreme price volatility;
Difficulty for participants in accurately evaluating the investment and making informed investment decisions;
Lack of readily available assets held in trust for payment of benefits since cryptocurrency exists as lines of computer code in a digital wallet, which may make it more vulnerable to theft and loss;
Uncertainty surrounding the reliability and accuracy of cryptocurrency valuations; and
The continually-evolving regulatory framework.
The Release goes on to state that the DOL expects to begin a program to investigate plan sponsors that permit cryptocurrency investments in 401(k) plans and to question plan fiduciaries as to how they were able to reconcile the decision to permit such investments with their duties of prudence and loyalty under ERISA. Violations of these duties expose plan fiduciaries to personal liability with respect to associated investment losses.
In April, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce sent a letter to Ali Khawar, the acting assistant secretary of the Employee Benefits Security Administration, the segment of the DOL that oversees employee benefit plans, stating that the DOL should seek to engage industry members to gather more facts and collaborate on possible solutions to cryptocurrency investments, rather than the DOL taking unilateral action. Mr. Khawar indicated in a subsequent interview with Law360 that the DOL has no intention of revoking its recent guidance regarding cryptocurrency investments in 401(k) plans.
In Congress, U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) sent a letter to the DOL on March 29, 2022, also criticizing the Release. In an April 20, 2022 response to the Senator’s letter, Mr. Khawar reiterated the key points of the Release and provided no indication that the DOL would not stand behind it. Shortly after Mr. Khawar’s response, Senator Tuberville introduced the Financial Freedom Act of 2022 (S. 1447), which, if passed in its current form, would, among other things, (i) provide that plan fiduciaries do not breach the ERISA duty of prudence by selecting a brokerage window or as a result of participant investment selections through that brokerage window, (ii) make available to fiduciaries ERISA section 404(c) protections with respect to brokerage windows (section 404(c) generally provides that fiduciaries are not responsible for investment losses if participants select investments from a menu made available by the fiduciaries), and (iii) bar the DOL from issuing regulations or other guidance restricting the types of investments available through a 401(k) plan brokerage window.
On the other side of the Congressional aisle, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Tina Smith (D-MN) sent a letter in early May to one retirement plan provider that recently announced that it will begin offering Bitcoin as an investment option that 401(k) plan fiduciaries may choose to include as part of the core menu of plan investment options. The letter questioned the appropriateness of the announcement in light of the Release and listed questions for the provider’s response to the Senators. The letter follows Mr Khawar stating in an interview with The Wall Street Journal that the DOL has “grave concerns” regarding the provider’s announcement.
While the landscape of cryptocurrency investments in 401(k) plans may change in the future, the Release remains outstanding and the DOL has given every indication that it intends to follow through with the actions laid out in it. Given that, plan fiduciaries that permit cryptocurrency investments in their plans, whether as part of the core investment menu or through a brokerage window, should consider, at a minimum, how they would address each of the five areas of concern the DOL raises in the Release.
About this Author
Matt Grunert advises clients on matters related to executive compensation, equity compensation plans and award agreements, M&A and capital market transactions, and credit and financing arrangements. Matt also works with clients on the design, implementation and maintenance of defined contribution and defined benefits plans, as well as healthcare and welfare plans.
He has represented clients before various agencies, including the Internal Revenue Service, the Department of Labor and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
Scott C. Sanders provides legal counsel in employee benefits and represents publicly traded and privately owned companies in the design, implementation and administration of employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements. He also handles the analysis and structuring of the employee benefit programs in corporate reorganizations, acquisitions, mergers and divestitures.
You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review’s (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.
Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com intended to be a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional. NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us.
Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.
The National Law Review – National Law Forum LLC 3 Grant Square #141 Hinsdale, IL 60521 Telephone (708) 357-3317 or toll free (877) 357-3317. If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.
Tech
via Inferse.com https://www.inferse.com
May 13, 2022 at 07:00AM